Convention on the International Maritime Organization*
Done at Geneva on 6 March 1948
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 17 March 1958, in accordance with article 60.
REGISTRATION: 17 March 1958, No. 4214.
TEXT: United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 289, p. 3, and vol. 1520, p. 297 (procès-verbal of rectification of Spanish authentic text).
STATUS: Signatories: 24. Parties: 157.
Note: The Convention was prepared and opened for signature and acceptance by the United Nations Maritime Conference convened by the Secretary-General of the United Nations pursuant to Economic and Social Council resolution 35 (IV). 1 The Conference met at Geneva from 19 February to 6 March 1948. For the text of the Final Act of the Conference, see United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 289, p. 3.
*As a result of the entry into force of the amendments adopted by the IMCO Assembly by its resolutions A.358 (IX) of 14 November 1975 and A.371 (X) of 9 November 1977 [see chapter XII.1(d)], the name of the Intergovernmental Maritime Consultative Organization (IMCO) has been changed to "International Maritime Organization (IMO)" and the title of the Convention modified accordingly.
|
Signature |
Definitive signature (s), acceptance |
Albania 24 May 1993
Algeria 31 Oct 1963
Angola 6 Jun 1977
Antigua and Barbuda 13 Jan 1986
Argentina 6 Mar 1948 18 Jun 1953
Australia 6 Mar 1948 13 Feb 1952
Austria 2 Apr 1975
Azerbaijan 15 May 1995
Bahamas 22 Jul 1976
Bahrain 22 Sep 1976
Bangladesh 27 May 1976
Barbados 7 Jan 1970
Belgium 6 Mar 1948 9 Aug 1951
Belize 13 Sep 1990
Benin 19 Mar 1980
Bolivia 6 Jul 1987
Bosnia and Herzegovina 16 Jul 1993
Brazil 4 Mar 1963
Brunei Darussalam 31 Dec 1984
Bulgaria 5 Apr 1960
Cambodia 3 Jan 1961
Cameroon 1 May 1961
Canada 15 Oct 1948
Cape Verde 24 Aug 1976
Chile 6 Mar 1948 17 Feb 1972
China 3 1 Mar 1973
Colombia 6 Mar 1948 19 Nov 1974
Congo 5 Sep 1975
Costa Rica 4 Mar 1981
Côte d'Ivoire 4 Nov 1960
Croatia 8 Jul 1992
Cuba 6 Mar 1966
Cyprus 21 Nov 1973
Czech Republic 18 Jun 1993
Democratic People's
Republic of Korea 16 Apr 1986
Democratic Republic of the Congo 16 Aug 1973
Denmark 3 Jun 1959
Djibouti 20 Feb 1979
Dominica 18 Dec 1979
Dominican Republic 25 Aug 1953
Ecuador 12 Jul 1956
Egypt 6 Mar 1948 17 Mar 1958
El Salvador 12 Feb 1981
Equatorial Guinea 6 Sep 1972
Eritrea 31 Aug 1993
Estonia 31 Jan 1992
Ethiopia 3 Jul 1975
Fiji 14 Mar 1983
Finland 6 Mar 1948 21 Apr 1959
France 6 Mar 1948 9 Apr 1952
Gabon 1 Apr 1976
Gambia 11 Jan 1979
Georgia 22 Jun 1993
Germany
4,5 7 Jan 1959 sGhana 6 Jul 1959
Greece 6 Mar 1948 31 Dec 1958
Grenada 3 Dec 1998
Guatemala 16 Mar 1983
Guinea 3 Dec 1975
Guinea-Bissau 6 Dec 1977
Guyana 13 May 1980
Haiti 23 Jun 1953
Honduras 13 Apr 1954 23 Aug 1954
Hungary 10 Jun 1970
Iceland 8 Nov 1960
India 6 Mar 1948 6 Jan 1959
Indonesia 6 18 Jan 1961
Iran (Islamic
Republic of) 10 Jun 1954 2 Jan 1958
Iraq 28 Aug 1973
Ireland 6 Mar 1948 26 Feb 1951
Israel 24 Apr 1952
Italy 6 Mar 1948 28 Jan 1957
Jamaica 11 May 1976
Japan 17 Mar 1958
Jordan 9 Nov 1973
Kazakhstan 11 Mar 1994
Kenya 22 Aug 1973
Kuwait
7 5 Jul 1960Latvia 1 Mar 1993
Lebanon 6 Mar 1948 3 May 1966
Liberia 9 Mar 1954 6 Jan 1959
Libyan Arab
Jamahiriya 16 Feb 1970
Lithuania 7 Dec 1995
Luxembourg 14 Feb 1991
Madagascar 8 Mar 1961
Malawi 19 Jan 1989
Malaysia 17 Jun 1971
Maldives 31 May 1967
Malta 22 Jun 1966
sMarshall Islands 26 Mar 1998
Mauritania
7 8 May 1961Mauritius 18 May 1978
Mexico 21 Sep 1954
Monaco 22 Dec 1989
Mongolia 11 Dec 1996
Morocco 30 Jul 1962
Mozambique 17 Jan 1979
Myanmar 6 Jul 1951
Namibia 27 Oct 1994
Nepal 31 Jan 1979
Netherlands 6 Mar 1948 31 Mar 1949
New Zealand 9 Nov 1960
Nicaragua 17 Mar 1982
Nigeria 15 Mar 1962
Norway 29 Dec 1958
Oman 30 Jan 1974
Pakistan 21 Nov 1958
Panama 31 Dec 1958
Papua New Guinea 6 May 1976
Paraguay 15 Mar 1993
Peru 15 Apr 1968
Philippines 9 Nov 1964
Poland 6 Mar 1948 16 Mar 1960
Portugal 6 Mar 1948 17 Mar 1976
Qatar 19 May 1977
Republic of Korea 7 10 Apr 1962
Romania 28 Apr 1965
Russian Federation 24 Dec 1958
Saint Lucia 10 Apr 1980
Saint Vincent
and the Grenadines 29 Apr 1981
Samoa 25 Oct 1996
Sao Tome
and Principe 9 Jul 1990
Saudi Arabia 25 Feb 1969
Senegal 7 Nov 1960
Seychelles 13 Jun 1978
Sierra Leone 14 Mar 1973
Singapore 17 Jan 1966
Slovakia 24 Mar 1993
Slovenia 10 Feb 1993
Solomon Islands 27 Jun 1988
Somalia 4 Apr 1978
South Africa 28 Feb 1995
Spain 23 Jan 1962
Sri Lanka 6 Apr 1972
Sudan 5 Jul 1974
Suriname 14 Oct 1976
Sweden 27 Apr 1959
Switzerland 6 Mar 1948 20 Jul 1955
Syrian Arab Republic 28 Jan 1963
Thailand 20 Sep 1973
the former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia 13 Oct 1993
Togo 20 Jun 1983
Trinidad and Tobago 27 Apr 1965
Tunisia 23 May 1963
Turkey 6 Mar 1948 25 Mar 1958
Turkmenistan 26 Aug 1993
Ukraine 28 Mar 1994
United Arab Emirates 4 Mar 1980
United Kingdom 6 Mar 1948 14 Feb 1949
United Republic
of Tanzania 8 Jan 1974
United States
of America 6 Mar 1948 17 Aug 1950
Uruguay 10 May 1968
sVanuatu 15 Oct 1986 21 Oct 1986
Venezuela 27 Oct 1975
Viet Nam 12 Jun 1984
Yemen
8 14 Mar 1979Yugoslavia 12 Feb 1960
Declarations and Reservations
bahrain
9"The acceptance of the Convention on the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization by the State of Bahrain shall, however, in no way signify recognition of, or entry into any relations with Israel".
CAMBODIA 10
In accepting the Convention on the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, the Royal Government of Cambodia declares that the measures it has adopted or may adopt forgiving encouragement or assistance to its national shipping and shipping industries (such, for instance, as loan-financing of national shipping companies at reasonable or even concessional rates of interest, or the allocation to Cambodian ships of cargoes owned or controlled by the Royal Government, or the reservation of coastal trade for national shipping) and such other matters as it may adopt with the object of promoting the development of its own national shipping, are consistent with the purposes of the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization as defined in article 1 (b) of the Convention.
Accordingly, the Royal Government will proceed to a re-examination, before they are put into effect, of any recommendations relating to this subject that may be adopted by the Organization.
The Royal Government further declares that its acceptance of the above-mentioned Convention neither has nor shall have the effect of altering or modifying in any way the law in force in the territory of the Kingdom of Cambodia.
cuba
In accepting the Convention on the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, the Revolutionary Government of the Republic of Cuba declares that its current legislation, which is duly adapted to the encouragement and development of its Merchant Marine, is consistent with the General purposes of the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization as defined in article 1 (b) of the Convention. Accordingly, any recommendations relating to this subject that may be adopted by the Organization will be re-examined by the Government of Cuba in the light of the national policy in this regard.
DENMARK
"The Government of Denmark supports the work programme adopted during the first Assembly of the Organization in January 1959 and holds the view that it is in the field of technical and nautical matters that the Organization can make its contribution towards the development of shipping and seaborne trade throughout the world.
"If the Organization were to extend its activities to matters of purely commercial or economic nature, a situation might arise where the Government of Denmark would have to consider resorting to the provisions regarding withdrawal contained in article 59 of the Convention."
ecuador
The Government of Ecuador declares that the protectionist measures adopted in the interests of its National Merchant Marine and the Merchant Fleet of Greater Colombia (Flota Mercante Grancolomibiana), the vessels belonging to which are regarded as ecuadorian by reason of the participation of the Government of Ecuador in the said Fleet, are measures the sole object of which is to promote the development of the National Merchant Marine and of the Merchant Fleet of Greater Colombia and are consistent with the purposes of the Inter-Governmental Maritime Organization, as defined in article 1 (b) of the Convention. Accordingly, any recommendations relating to this subject that may be adopted by the Organization will be re-examined by the Government of Ecuador.
finland
"The Government of Finland support the work programme proposed by the Preparatory Committee of the Organization in document IMCO/A.I/11. The Government of Finland hold the view that it is in the field of technical and nautical matters that the Organization can make its contribution towards the development of shipping and seaborne trade throughout the world.
"If the Organization were to extend its activities to matters of a purely commercial or economic nature, a situation might arise where the Government of Finland would have to consider resorting to the provisions regarding withdrawal contained in article 59 of the Convention."
greece
"Greece, in re-confirming its acceptance, considers that the aforesaid Organization can play a useful and important role in the field of technical and nautical matters, thus contributing to the development of shipping and seaborne trade throughout the world. In case the Organization extends its activities to matters of commercial and economic nature, the Greek Government may find itself bound to reconsider its acceptance of the Convention and avail itself of its provisions concerning withdrawal as laid down in article 59."
iceland
"Iceland will reconsider its ratification, if it subsequently were decided to extend IMCO's competence so as also to deal with questions of an entirely financial or commercial nature.
"Great stress is laid by Iceland on the real validity of article 59 of the Convention, regarding withdrawal."
india 11
"In accepting the Convention on the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, the Government of India declare that any measures which it adopts or may have adopted for giving encouragement and assistance to its national shipping and shipping industries (such, for instance, as loan-financing of national shipping companies at reasonable or even concessional rates of interest, or the allocation of Government-owned or Government-controlled cargoes to national ships or the reservation of the coastal trade for national shipping) and such other matters as the Government of India may adopt, the sole object of which is to promote the development of its own national shipping, are consistent with the purposes of the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization as defined in article 1 (b) of the Convention. Accordingly, any recommendations relating to this subject that may be adopted by the Organization will be subject to re-examination by the Government of India. The Government of India further expressly state that its acceptance of the above-mentioned Convention neither has nor shall have the effect of altering or modifying in any way the law on the subject in force in the territories of the Republic of India."
indonesia 12
"In accepting the Convention, the Government of the Republic of Indonesia declares that it is in the field of technical and nautical matters that the Organization can make its contribution towards the development of shipping and seaborne trade throughout the world.
"On matters of a purely commercial or economic nature, the Government holds the view that assistance and encouragement to its national shipping industries for the development of its domestic and foreign trade and for purposes of security, are consistent with the purposes of the Organization as defined in article 1 (b) of the Convention.
"Accordingly, the acceptance shall never have the effect of altering or modifying in any recommendation relating to this subject adopted by the Organization will be subject to re-examination by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia."
iraq 13
The participation of the Republic of Iraq in this Convention shall, however, in no way signify recognition of, or entry into any relations with Israel.
The Republic of Iraq hereby declares that article 1 (b) of the Convention is not in conflict with the measures taken by it to encourage and assist national shipping companies, such as the granting of financial loans, the assignment of cargo vessels flying its flag to carry specific goods and the assignment of commercial vessels, or any other measures aimed at the development and growth of the national fleet or national shipping.
malaysia 14
"In accepting the Convention of the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, the Government of Malaysia declares that any measures which she may adopt for giving encouragement or assistance to her national shipping industries (for instance, such as loan financing of national shipping companies at reasonable or even concessional rates of interest or the allocation to Malaysian cargo ships owned or controlled by the Malaysian Government, or the reservation of coastal trade for national shipping) and such other matter as she may adopt with the object of promoting the development of her own national shipping, are consistent with the purposes of the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization as defined in article 1 (b) of the Convention. Accordingly any recommendations relating to this subject that may be adopted by the Organization will be re-examined by the Government of Malaysia. The Government of Malaysia further expressly states that her acceptance of the above-mentioned Convention neither has nor shall have the effect of altering or modifying in any way the law on the subject in force in Malaysia."
mexico
The Government of the United States of Mexico, in accepting the Convention on the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, on the understanding that nothing in the said Convention is intended to change national legislation relating to restrictive business practices, expressly states that its acceptance of the above-mentioned international instrument neither has nor shall have the effect of altering or modifying in any way the application of the laws against monopolies in the territory of the Republic of Mexico.
morocco
In joining the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, the Government of the Kingdom of Morocco wishes to declare that it is not in agreement with a possible broadening of the scope of the activities of this Organization from the purely technical and nautical activities into the field of matters of an economic and commercial nature as stated in article 1 (b) and (c) of the Convention for the Establishment of the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization. If such a broadening of the field of activities of the Organization were to take place, the Government of the Kingdom of Morocco reserves the right to reconsider its position concerning the ensuing situation, and might be led to invoke the provisions of article 59 of the Convention, regarding the withdrawal of members from the Organization.
norway
"The Norwegian Government supports the work programme proposed by the Preparatory Committee of the Organization in document IMCO/A.I/11. The Norwegian Government holds the view that it is in the field of technical and nautical matters that the Organization can make its contribution towards the development of shipping and seaborne trade throughout the world.
"If the Organization were to extend its activities to matters of a purely commercial or economic nature, a situation might arise where the Norwegian Government would have to consider resorting to the provisions regarding withdrawal contained in article 59 of the Convention."
poland
"In accepting the Convention on the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, signed at Geneva on 6 March 1948, the Government of the Polish People's Republic declares that it supports the work programme of the Organization, approved by the Assembly at its First Session held in January 1959.
"The Government of the Polish People's Republic holds the view that it is in the field of technical and nautical matters that the Organization shall make its contribution towards the development of shipping and seaborne trade throughout the world."
spain
The Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization may not extend its activities to economic or commercial questions but must limit itself to questions of a technical character.
sri lanka 16
In accepting the Convention on the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, as amended, the Government of Ceylon declares that any measures which it adopts or may have adopted for giving encouragement and assistance to its national shipping and shipping industries (such, for instance, as loan-financing of national shipping companies at reasonable or even concessional rates of interest, or the allocation of Government-owned or Government-controlled cargoes to national ships or the reservation of the coastal trade for national shipping) and such other matters as the Government of Ceylon may adopt, the sole object of which is to promote the development of its own national shipping, are consistent with the purposes of the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization as defined in article 1 (b) of the Convention. Accordingly, any recommendations relating to this subject that may be adopted by the Organization will be subject to re-examination by the Government of Ceylon. The Government of Ceylon further expressly states that its acceptance of the above-mentioned Convention neither has nor shall have the effect of altering or modifying in any way the law on the subject in force in Ceylon.
sweden
"In accepting the Convention on the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, the Government of Sweden declares that it supports the work programme of the Organization as per document A.I/11 and its corrigendum 1, decided upon by the first meeting of the Assembly of the Organization in January 1959.
"The Government of Sweden holds the view that it is in the field of technical and nautical matters that the Organization can make its contribution towards the development of shipping and seaborne trade throughout the world.
"If the Organization were to extend its activities to matters of a purely commercial or economic nature, a situation might arise in which the Government of Sweden would have to consider resorting to the provisions regarding withdrawal contained in article 59 of the Convention."
swiTzerland
In depositing its instrument of ratification of the Convention on the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization (IMCO), Switzerland makes the general reservation that its participation in the work of IMCO, more particularly as regards that organizations relations with the United Nations, cannot exceed the bounds implicit in Switzerland's status as a perpetually neutral State. In conformity with this general reservation, Switzerland wishes to make a particular reservation both in respect of the text of article VI as incorporated in the Agreement, at present in draft form, between IMCO and the United Nations, and in respect of any similar clause which may replace or supplement that provision in the said agreement or in any other arrangement.
turkey
"[Participation by Turkey] will in no way have any effect on the provisions of the Turkish laws concerning cabotage and monopoly."
united arab emirates 9
"The Government of the United Arab Emirates takes the view that its acceptance of the said Convention and amendments does not in any way imply its recognition of Israel, nor does it oblige to apply the provisions of the Convention and amendments in respect of the said Country.
"The Government of the United Arab Emirates wishes further to indicate that its understanding described above is in conformity with General practice existing in United Arab Emirates regarding signature, ratification, or acceptance to a Convention which a country not recognized by United Arab Emirates is a party."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 17
"It being understood that nothing in the Convention on the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization is intended to alter domestic legislation with respect to restrictive business practices, it is hereby declared that ratification of that Convention by the Government of the United States of America does not and will not have the effect of altering or modifying in any way the application of the anti-trust statutes of the United States of America."
viet nam
In accepting the Convention on the International Maritime Organization, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam states to support the purposes of the said Organization as defined in article 1 of the Convention. On the basis of state sovereignty and proceeding from its foreign Policy of peace, friendship, co-operation, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam will take into consideration the recommendations relating to the subject as provided in article 1 (b) of the Convention and relating amendments which may arise.
Yugoslavia
"In joining the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, the Government of the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia wishes to declare that it is not in agreement with a possible broadening of the scope of the activities of this Organization from the purely technical and nautical activities into the field of matters of an economic and commercial nature as stated in Article 1, sections under (b) and (c) of the Convention for the establishment of the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization. If such a broadening of the field of activities of the Organization were to take place the Government of the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia reserves the right to reconsider its position concerning the ensuing situation.
"At the same time, the Government of the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia declares its readiness to fulfil all its obligations toward the Organization, as stated in the instrument of ratification."
Participation of Territories in the Convention (article 58)
|
Date of receipt of the notification |
Territories |
|
|
Netherlands 15 |
3 Oct 1949 |
Indonesia, Surinam and the Netherlands Antilles. |
|
|
|
[ By a further notification received on 12 July 1951, notice was given that the participation Netherlands in this Convention, from 27 December 1949, no longer includes the territories under the jurisdiction of the Republic of Indonesia but includes Surinam, the Netherlands Antilles (formerly the Netherlands West Indies) and Netherlands New Guinea] |
|
United Kingdom 18,19,20 |
19 Jan 1960 |
Federation of Nigeria |
|
|
2 Oct 1961 |
Sarawak and North Borneo |
|
|
7 Jun 1967 |
Hong Kong |
Associate Membership in the Organization (article 9)
|
Portugal 21 |
2 Feb 1990 |
Macau |
|
| 20 |
19 Jan 1960 |
Federation of Nigeria |
|
|
|
2 Oct 1961 |
Joint associate membership of Sarawak and North Borneo |
|
|
|
7 Jun 1967 |
Hong Kong | |
Amendments to the Convention on the International Maritime Organization
(a
) Amendments to articles 17 and 18 of the ConventionAdopted by the Assembly of the Organization by resolution A.69 (ES.II) of 15 September 1964
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 6 October 1967 for all Members of the Organization, in accordance with article 52 of the Convention.
REGISTRATION: 6 October 1967, No. 4214.
TEXT: United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 607, p. 276.
STATUS: Acceptances: 90.
Note: See "Note:" at beginning of chapter XII.1.
Note: Pursuant to article 54 of the Convention, the acceptance of an amendment shall be made by the communication of an instrument to the Secretary-General of the Organization for deposit with the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Following is the list of States which have accepted the amendments to articles 17 and 18 of the Convention, either upon acceptance of the Convention or thereafter, showing the respective dates of receipt of the instruments of acceptance by the Secretary-General of the Organization and the dates of their deposit with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
In accordance with article 52 of the Convention, the Assembly of the International Maritime Consultative Organization determined that these amendments were of such a nature that any Member which hereafter declares that it did not accept such amendments and within a period of twelve months after they had come into force would, upon the expiration of this period, cease to be a Party to the Convention.
|
Date of receipt of the instrument of acceptance (IMO) |
Date of deposit of the instrument of acceptance |
Albania 24 May 1993
Algeria 26 Oct 1967 3 Nov 1967
Antigua and Barbuda 13 Jan 1986
Argentina 30 Sep 1966 5 Oct 1966
Australia 6 Jan 1965 15 Feb 1965
Azerbaijan 15 May 1995
Belgium 20 Jul 1965 26 Jul 1965
Belize 13 Sep 1990
Benin 19 Mar 1980
Bosnia and Herzegovina 16 Jul 1993
Brazil 17 Nov 1966 30 Dec 1966
Bulgaria 29 Sep 1966 3 Oct 1966
Cambodia 18 Aug 1966 22 Aug 1966
Canada 25 Jan 1965 15 Feb 1965
China
22Costa Rica 4 Mar 1981
Côte d'Ivoire 17 Sep 1965 4 Oct 1965
Croatia 8 Jul 1992
Czech Republic 18 Jun 1993
Democratic People's
Republic of Korea 16 Apr 1986
Democratic Republic
of the Congo 16 Aug 1973
Denmark 10 Jun 1965 14 Jul 1965
Dominican Republic 28 Jun 1966 11 Jul 1966
Ecuador 12 Aug 1965 18 Aug 1965
Egypt 11 Mar 1966 18 Mar 1966
Eritrea 31 Aug 1993
Estonia 31 Jan 1992
Finland 17 Jan 1967 20 Jan 1967
France 5 Apr 1965 21 Apr 1965
Georgia 22 Jun 1993
Germany
4,5 24 Sep 1965 7 Oct 1965Ghana 2 Apr 1965 17 May 1965
Greece 1 Dec 1965 3 Dec 1965
Grenada 3 Dec 1998
Iceland 10 Sep 1965 14 Sep 1965
India 23 Feb 1965 17 Mar 1965
Indonesia 11 Oct 1966 21 Oct 1966
Iran (Islamic
Republic of) 8 Jun 1966 15 Jun 1966
Ireland 8 Jun 1965 14 Jun 1965
Israel 6 Feb 1967 9 Feb 1967
Kazakhstan 11 Mar 1994
Kenya 22 Aug 1973
Kuwait 2 Sep 1966 6 Sep 1966
Latvia 1 Mar 1993
Lebanon 15 Feb 1967 20 Feb 1967
Lithuania 7 Dec 1995
Luxembourg 14 Feb 1991
Madagascar 18 Feb 1965 25 Feb 1965
Malta 5 Sep 1966 8 Sep 1966
Marshall Islands 26 Mar 1998
Mauritania 1 Nov 1966 4 Nov 1966
Mexico 11 Oct 1967 16 Oct 1967
Mongolia 11 Dec 1996
Morocco 6 Sep 1965 7 Oct 1965
Myanmar 27 Sep 1966 6 Oct 1966
Namibia 27 Oct 1994
Netherlands 21 Sep 1965 4 Oct 1965
New Zealand 22 Nov 1965 26 Nov 1965
Nigeria 6 Dec 1967 11 Dec 1967
Norway 9 Sep 1965 13 Sep 1965
Pakistan 11 Jun 1965 18 Jun 1965
Panama 28 Jul 1966 2 Aug 1966
Papua New Guinea 6 May 1976
Paraguay 15 Mar 1993
Philippines 31 Oct 1966 2 Nov 1966
Poland 30 Jun 1965 9 Jul 1965
Republic of Korea 29 Apr 1965 5 May 1965
Romania 29 Jul 1966 3 Aug 1966
Russian Federation 16 Dec 1965 20 Dec 1965
Samoa 25 Oct 1996
Sao Tome
and Principe 9 Oct 1990
Senegal 28 Sep 1966 6 Oct 1966
Sierra Leone 14 Mar 1973
Singapore 14 Feb 1966 18 Feb 1966
Slovakia 24 Mar 1993
Slovenia 10 Feb 1993
Solomon Islands 27 Jun 1988
South Africa 28 Feb 1995
Spain 16 Jun 1965 28 Jun 1965
Sudan 5 Jul 1974
Sweden 9 Sep 1965 13 Sep 1965
Switzerland 9 Jan 1967 13 Jan 1967
the former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia 13 Oct 1993
Trinidad and Tobago 24 Nov 1966 5 Dec 1966
Tunisia 28 Mar 1966 8 Apr 1966
Turkmenistan 26 Aug 1993
Ukraine 28 Mar 1994
United Kingdom 26 Jan 1965 15 Feb 1965
United States
of America 21 Jul 1966 25 Jul 1966
Vanuatu 15 Oct 1986 21 Oct 1986
Yugoslavia 4 Mar 1966 11 Mar 1966