Optional Protocol of Signature concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes
Done at Geneva on 29 April 1958
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 30 September 1962.
REGISTRATION: 3 January 1963, No. 6466.
TEXT: United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 450, p. 169.
STATUS: Signatories: 15. Parties: 371.
Note: See "Note" in the same place in chapter XXI.1.
|
Signature 1 |
Definitive signature (s) , ratification, succession (d) |
Australia 14 May 1963
sAustria 27 Oct 1958
Belgium 6 Jan 1972
sBolivia 17 Oct 1958
sBosnia and Herzegovina 12 Jan 1994
dCambodia 22 Jan 1970
Canada 29 Apr 1958
China 2
Colombia 3 29 Apr 1958
sCosta Rica 29 Apr 1958
sCuba 29 Apr 1958
sDenmark 29 Apr 1958 26 Sep 1968
Dominican Republic 29 Apr 1958
sFinland 27 Oct 1958 16 Feb 1965
France 30 Oct 1958
sGermany4, 5 30 Oct 1958 26 Jul 1973
Ghana 29 Apr 1958
sHaiti 29 Apr 1958 29 Mar 1960
Holy See 30 Apr 1958
sHungary 8 Dec 1989
sIndonesia 6 8 May 1958
Israel 29 Apr 1958
Liberia 27 May 1958
sMadagascar 10 Aug 1962
sMalawi 17 Dec 1965
sMalaysia 1 May 1961
sMalta 19 May 1966
dMauritius 5 Oct 1970
dNepal 29 Apr 1958
sNetherlands 31 Oct 1958 18 Feb 1966
New Zealand 29 Oct 1958
sPakistan 6 Nov 1958
sPanama 2 May 1958
sPortugal 28 Oct 1958 8 Jan 1963
Sierra Leone 14 Feb 1963
sSolomon Islands 3 Sep 1981
dSri Lanka 30 Oct 1958
sSweden 1 Jun 1966 28 Jun 1966
Switzerland 24 May 1958 18 May 1966
Uganda 15 Sep 1964
sUnited Kingdom 9 Sep 1958
sUnited States of America 7 15 Sep 1958
Uruguay 29 Apr 1958
sYugoslavia 29 Apr 1958 28 Jan 1966
NOTES:
1 Article V of the Protocol provides that the latter "shall remain open for signature by all States who become Parties to any Convention on the Law of the Sea and is subject to ratification, where necessary, according to the constitutional requirements of the signatory States". Consequently, the signatures listed above appear in the second or third column according to whether they have been affixed subject or not to ratification.
The States listed herein are bound by this Protocol to the extent that they have signed it definitively, ratified it or succeeded to it, and that they are bound by one at least of the four Law of the Sea Conventions.
2 Signature affixed without reservation as to ratification on behalf of the Republic of China on 29 April 1958. See note concerning signatures, ratifications, accessions, etc. on behalf of China (note in chapter I.1).
3 In signing the Optional Protocol, the delegation of Colombia reserved the obligations of Colombia arising out of conventions concerning the peaceful settlement of disputes which Colombia has ratified and out of any previous conventions concerning the same subject which Colombia may ratify.
4 See note in chapter I.2.
5 With the following declaration:
"The Optional Protocol shall also apply to Berlin (West) with effect from the date on which it enters into force for the Federal Republic of Germany."
In this connection, the Secretary-General received on 5 November 1973 the following communication from the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics:
The Soviet Union can take note of the declaration by the Federal Republic of Germany concerning application to Berlin (West) of . . . the Optional Protocol of signature concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes only on the understanding that such application conforms to the Quadripartite Agreement of 3 September 1971 and is subject to observance of the established procedures.
Communications, identical in essence, were received from the Government of Czechoslovakia (on 6 December 1973.
See also note in chapter I.2.) and the Byelorussian SSR (on 13 February 1974).See also note 4 above.
6 In a communication received on 24 December 1958, the Government of Indonesia informed the Secretary-General that according to the constitutional requirements of Indonesia, the signature affixed on its behalf to this Protocol is subject to ratification.
7 In a communication received on 10 June 1963, the Government of the United States of America informed the Secretary-General that the Protocol "will not enter into force with respect to the United States until the Protocol has been ratified on the part of the United States and instrument of ratification has been deposited".