Convention on Biological Diversity
Opened for signature at Rio de Janeiro on 5 June 1992
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 29 December 1993, in accordance with article 36 (1).
REGISTRATION: 29 December 1993, No. 30619.
TEXT: Doc. UNEP/Bio.Div/N7-INC.5/4 and depositary notification C.N.393.1993.TREATIES-11 of 7 February 1994 (procès-verbal of rectification of the authentic English text); and C.N.329.1996.TREATIES-2 of 18 March 1996 (procès-verbal of rectification of the authentic arabic text).
STATUS: Signatories: 168. Parties: 175.
Note: The Convention was adopted by the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Convention on Biological Diversity, during its Fifth session, held at Nairobi from 11 to 22 May 1992. The Convention was open for signature at Rio de Janeiro by all States and regional economic integration organizations from 5 June 1992 until 14 June 1992, and remained open at the United Nations Headquarters in New York until 4 June 1993.
|
Signature |
Ratification, accession (a), acceptance (A), approval (AA) |
Afghanistan 12 Jun 1992
Albania 5 Jan 1994
aAlgeria 13 Jun 1992 14 Aug 1995
Angola 12 Jun 1992 1 Apr 1998
Antigua and Barbuda 5 Jun 1992 9 Mar 1993
Argentina 12 Jun 1992 22 Nov 1994
Armenia 13 Jun 1992 14 May 1993
AAustralia 5 Jun 1992 18 Jun 1993
Austria 13 Jun 1992 18 Aug 1994
Azerbaijan 12 Jun 1992
Bahamas 12 Jun 1992 2 Sep 1993
Bahrain 9 Jun 1992 30 Aug 1996
Bangladesh 5 Jun 1992 3 May 1994
Barbados 12 Jun 1992 10 Dec 1993
Belarus 11 Jun 1992 8 Sep 1993
Belgium 5 Jun 1992 22 Nov 1996
Belize 13 Jun 1992 30 Dec 1993
Benin 13 Jun 1992 30 Jun 1994
Bhutan 11 Jun 1992 25 Aug 1995
Bolivia 13 Jun 1992 3 Oct 1994
Botswana 8 Jun 1992 12 Oct 1995
Brazil 5 Jun 1992 28 Feb 1994
Bulgaria 12 Jun 1992 17 Apr 1996
Burkina Faso 12 Jun 1992 2 Sep 1993
Burundi 11 Jun 1992 15 Apr 1997
Cambodia 9 Feb 1995
aCameroon 14 Jun 1992 19 Oct 1994
Canada 11 Jun 1992 4 Dec 1992
Cape Verde 12 Jun 1992 29 Mar 1995
Central African Republic 13 Jun 1992 15 Mar 1995
Chad 12 Jun 1992 7 Jun 1994
Chile 13 Jun 1992 9 Sep 1994
China 11 Jun 1992 5 Jan 1993
Colombia 12 Jun 1992 28 Nov 1994
Comoros 11 Jun 1992 29 Sep 1994
Congo 11 Jun 1992 1 Aug 1996
Cook Islands 12 Jun 1992 20 Apr 1993
Costa Rica 13 Jun 1992 26 Aug 1994
Côte d'Ivoire 10 Jun 1992 29 Nov 1994
Croatia 11 Jun 1992 7 Oct 1996
Cuba 12 Jun 1992 8 Mar 1994
Cyprus 12 Jun 1992 10 Jul 1996
Czech Republic 4 Jun 1993 3 Dec 1993
AADemocratic People's Republic of Korea 11 Jun 1992 26 Oct 1994
AADemocratic Republic of the Congo 11 Jun 1992 3 Dec 1994
Denmark 12 Jun 1992 21 Dec 1993
Djibouti 13 Jun 1992 1 Sep 1994
Dominica 6 Apr 1994
aDominican Republic 13 Jun 1992 25 Nov 1996
Ecuador 9 Jun 1992 23 Feb 1993
Egypt 9 Jun 1992 2 Jun 1994
El Salvador 13 Jun 1992 8 Sep 1994
Equatorial Guinea 6 Dec 1994
aEritrea 21 Mar 1996
aEstonia 12 Jun 1992 27 Jul 1994
Ethiopia 10 Jun 1992 5 Apr 1994
European Community 13 Jun 1992 21 Dec 1993
AAFiji 9 Oct 1992 25 Feb 1993
Finland 5 Jun 1992 27 Jul 1994
AFrance 13 Jun 1992 1 Jul 1994
Gabon 12 Jun 1992 14 Mar 1997
Gambia 12 Jun 1992 10 Jun 1994
Georgia 2 Jun 1994
aGermany 12 Jun 1992 21 Dec 1993
Ghana 12 Jun 1992 29 Aug 1994
Greece 12 Jun 1992 4 Aug 1994
Grenada 3 Dec 1992 11 Aug 1994
Guatemala 13 Jun 1992 10 Jul 1995
Guinea 12 Jun 1992 7 May 1993
Guinea-Bissau 12 Jun 1992 27 Oct 1995
Guyana 13 Jun 1992 29 Aug 1994
Haiti 13 Jun 1992 25 Sep 1996
Honduras 13 Jun 1992 31 Jul 1995
Hungary 13 Jun 1992 24 Feb 1994
Iceland 10 Jun 1992 12 Sep 1994
India 5 Jun 1992 18 Feb 1994
Indonesia 5 Jun 1992 23 Aug 1994
Iran (Islamic Republic of) 14 Jun 1992 6 Aug 1996
Ireland 13 Jun 1992 22 Mar 1996
Israel 11 Jun 1992 7 Aug 1995
Italy 5 Jun 1992 15 Apr 1994
Jamaica 11 Jun 1992 6 Jan 1995
Japan 13 Jun 1992 28 May 1993
AJordan 11 Jun 1992 12 Nov 1993
Kazakhstan 9 Jun 1992 6 Sep 1994
Kenya 11 Jun 1992 26 Jul 1994
Kiribati 16 Aug 1994
aKuwait 9 Jun 1992
Kyrgyzstan 6 Aug 1996
aLao People's Democratic Republic 20 Sep 1996
aLatvia 11 Jun 1992 14 Dec 1995
Lebanon 12 Jun 1992 15 Dec 1994
Lesotho 11 Jun 1992 10 Jan 1995
Liberia 12 Jun 1992
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 29 Jun 1992
Liechtenstein 5 Jun 1992 19 Nov 1997
Lithuania 11 Jun 1992 1 Feb 1996
Luxembourg 9 Jun 1992 9 May 1994
Madagascar 8 Jun 1992 4 Mar 1996
Malawi 10 Jun 1992 2 Feb 1994
Malaysia 12 Jun 1992 24 Jun 1994
Maldives 12 Jun 1992 9 Nov 1992
Mali 30 Sep 1992 29 Mar 1995
Malta 12 Jun 1992
Marshall Islands 12 Jun 1992 8 Oct 1992
Mauritania 12 Jun 1992 16 Aug 1996
Mauritius 10 Jun 1992 4 Sep 1992
Mexico 13 Jun 1992 11 Mar 1993
Micronesia (Federated
States of) 12 Jun 1992 20 Jun 1994
Monaco 11 Jun 1992 20 Nov 1992
Mongolia 12 Jun 1992 30 Sep 1993
Morocco 13 Jun 1992 21 Aug 1995
Mozambique 12 Jun 1992 25 Aug 1995
Myanmar 11 Jun 1992 25 Nov 1994
Namibia 12 Jun 1992 16 May 1997
Nauru 5 Jun 1992 11 Nov 1993
Nepal 12 Jun 1992 23 Nov 1993
Netherlands 5 Jun 1992 12 Jul 1994
ANew Zealand 12 Jun 1992 16 Sep 1993
Nicaragua 13 Jun 1992 20 Nov 1995
Niger 11 Jun 1992 25 Jul 1995
Nigeria 13 Jun 1992 29 Aug 1994
Niue 28 Feb 1996
aNorway 9 Jun 1992 9 Jul 1993
Oman 10 Jun 1992 8 Feb 1995
Pakistan 5 Jun 1992 26 Jul 1994
Palau 6 Jan 1999
aPanama 13 Jun 1992 17 Jan 1995
Papua New Guinea 13 Jun 1992 16 Mar 1993
Paraguay 12 Jun 1992 24 Feb 1994
Peru 12 Jun 1992 7 Jun 1993
Philippines 12 Jun 1992 8 Oct 1993
Poland 5 Jun 1992 18 Jan 1996
Portugal 13 Jun 1992 21 Dec 1993
Qatar 11 Jun 1992 21 Aug 1996
Republic of Korea 13 Jun 1992 3 Oct 1994
Republic of Moldova 5 Jun 1992 20 Oct 1995
Romania 5 Jun 1992 17 Aug 1994
Russian Federation 13 Jun 1992 5 Apr 1995
Rwanda 10 Jun 1992 29 May 1996
Saint Kitts and Nevis 12 Jun 1992 7 Jan 1993
Saint Lucia 28 Jul 1993
aSaint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 Jun 1996
aSamoa 12 Jun 1992 9 Feb 1994
San Marino 10 Jun 1992 28 Oct 1994
Sao Tome and Principe 12 Jun 1992
Senegal 13 Jun 1992 17 Oct 1994
Seychelles 10 Jun 1992 22 Sep 1992
Sierra Leone 12 Dec 1994
aSingapore 10 Mar 1993 21 Dec 1995
Slovakia 19 May 1993 25 Aug 1994
AASlovenia 13 Jun 1992 9 Jul 1996
Solomon Islands 13 Jun 1992 3 Oct 1995
South Africa 4 Jun 1993 2 Nov 1995
Spain 13 Jun 1992 21 Dec 1993
Sri Lanka 10 Jun 1992 23 Mar 1994
Sudan 9 Jun 1992 30 Oct 1995
Suriname 13 Jun 1992 12 Jan 1996
Swaziland 12 Jun 1992 9 Nov 1994
Sweden 8 Jun 1992 16 Dec 1993
Switzerland 12 Jun 1992 21 Nov 1994
Syrian Arab Republic 3 May 1993 4 Jan 1996
Tajikistan 29 Oct 1997
aThailand 12 Jun 1992
the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 2 Dec 1997
aTogo 12 Jun 1992 4 Oct 1995
ATonga 19 May 1998
aTrinidad and Tobago 11 Jun 1992 1 Aug 1996
Tunisia 13 Jun 1992 15 Jul 1993
Turkey 11 Jun 1992 14 Feb 1997
Turkmenistan 18 Sep 1996
aTuvalu 8 Jun 1992
Uganda 12 Jun 1992 8 Sep 1993
Ukraine 11 Jun 1992 7 Feb 1995
United Arab Emirates 11 Jun 1992
United Kingdom 1 12 Jun 1992 3 Jun 1994
United Republic of Tanzania 12 Jun 1992 8 Mar 1996
United States of America 4 Jun 1993
Uruguay 9 Jun 1992 5 Nov 1993
Uzbekistan 19 Jul 1995
aVanuatu 9 Jun 1992 25 Mar 1993
Venezuela 12 Jun 1992 13 Sep 1994
Viet Nam 28 May 1993 16 Nov 1994
Yemen 12 Jun 1992 21 Feb 1996
Yugoslavia 8 Jun 1992
Zambia 11 Jun 1992 28 May 1993
Zimbabwe 12 Jun 1992 11 Nov 1994
Declarations
(Unless otherwise indicated, the declarations were made
upon ratification, accession, acceptance or approval.)
Argentina
Declaration:
The Argentine Government considers that this Convention represents a step forward in that it establishes among its objectives the sustainable use of biological diversity. Likewise, the definitions contained in article 2 and other provisions of the Convention indicate that the terms "genetic resources", "biological resources" and "biological material" do not include the human genome. In accordance with the commitments entered into in the Convention, the Argentine Nation will pass legislation on the conditions of access to biological resources and the ownership of future rights and benefits arising from them. The Convention is fully consistent with the principles established in the "Agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights", including trade in counterfeit goods, contained in the Final Act of the Uruguay Round of GATT.
Austria
Declaration:
"The Republic of Austria declares in accordance with article 27, paragraph 3 of the Convention that it accepts both of the means of dispute settlement mentioned in this paragraph as compulsory in relation to any Party accepting an obligation concerning one or both of these means of dispute settlement."
chile
Declaration:
The Government of Chile, on ratifying the Convention on Biological Diversity of 1992, wishes to place on record that the pine tree and other species that the country exploits as one of its forestry resources are considered exotic and are not taken to fall within the scope of the Convention.
cuba
Declaration:
The Government of the Republic of Cuba declares, with respect to article 27 of the Convention on Biological Diversity, that as far as the Republic of Cuba is concerned, disputes that arise between Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this international legal instrument shall be settled by negotiation through the diplomatic channel or, failing that, by arbitration in accordance with the procedure laid down in Annex II on arbitration of the Convention."
european community
Declaration:
"Within their respective competence, the European Community and its Member States wish to reaffirm the importance they attach to transfers of technology and to biotechnology in order to ensure the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity. The compliance with intellectual property rights constitutes an essential element for the implementation of policies for technology transfer and co-investment.
For the European Community and its member States, transfers of technology and access to biotechnology, as defined in the text of the Convention on Biological Diversity, will be carried out in accordance with article 16 of the said Convention and in compliance with the principles and rules of protection of intellectual property, in particular multilateral and bilateral agreements signed or negotiated by the Contracting Parties to this Convention.
The European Community and its Member States will encourage the use of the financial mechanism established by the Convention to promote the voluntary transfer of intellectual property rights held by European operators, in particular as regards the granting of licences, through normal commercial mechanisms and decisions, while ensuring adequate and effective protection of property rights."
france
Upon signature:
Declaration:
With reference to article 3, that it interprets that article as a guiding principle to be taken into account in the implementation of the Convention;
With reference to article 21, paragraph 1, that the decision taken periodically by the Conference of the Parties concerns the "amount of resources needed" and that no provision of the Convention authorizes the Conference of the Parties to take decisions concerning the amount, nature or frequency of the contributions from Parties to the Convention.
Upon ratification:
Declaration:
With reference to article 3, that it interprets that article as a guiding principle to be taken into account in the implementation of the Convention;
The French Republic reaffirms its belief in the importance of the transfer of technology and biotechnology in guaranteeing the protection and long-term utilization of biological diversity. Respect for intellectual property rights is an essential element of the implementation of policies for technology transfer and co-investment.
The French Republic affirms that the transfer of technology and access to biotechnology, as defined in the Convention on Biological Diversity, will be implemented according to article 16 of that Convention and with respect for the principles and rules concerning the protection of intellectual property, including multilateral agreements signed or negotiated by the Contracting parties to the present Convention.
The French Republic will encourage recourse to the financial mechanism established by the Convention for the purpose of promoting the voluntary transfer of intellectual property rights under French ownership,
inter alia, as regards the granting of licences, by traditional commercial decisions and mechanisms while ensuring the appropriate and effective protection of property rights.With reference to article 21, paragraph 1, the French Republic considers that the decision taken periodically by the Conference of the Parties concerns the "amount of resources needed" and that no provision of the Convention authorizes the Conference of the Parties to take decisions concerning the amount, nature or frequency of the contributions from Parties to the Convention.
georgia
Declaration:
"The Republic of Georgia will use both means for dispute settlement referred to in the Convention:
1. Arbitral consideration in accordance with the procedure given in the enclosure II, Part I.
2. Submitting of disputes to the International Court."
ireland
Declaration:
"Ireland wishes to reaffirm the importance it attaches to transfers of technology and to biotechnology in order to ensure the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity. The compliance with intellectual property rights constitutes an essential element for the implementation of policies for technology transfer and co-investment.
For Ireland, transfers of technology and access to biotechnology, as defined in the text of the Convention on Biological Diversity and in compliance with the principles and rules of protection of intellectual property, in particular multilateral and bilateral agreements signed or negotiated by the contracting parties to this Convention.
Ireland will encourage the use of the financial mechanism established by the Convention to promote the voluntary transfer of intellectual property rights held by Irish operators, in particular as regards the granting of licences, through normal commercial mechanisms and decisions, while ensuring adequate and effective protection of property rights."
italy
Declaration made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:
"The Italian Government [. . .] declares its understanding that the decision to be taken by the the Conference of the Parties under article 21.1 of the Convention refers to the `amount of resources needed' by the financial mechanism, not to the extent or nature and form of the contributions of the Contracting Parties."
latvia
Declaration:
"The Republic of Latvia declares in accordance with article 27 paragraph 3 of the Convention that it accepts both the means of dispute settlement mentioned in this paragraph as compulsory."
liechtenstein
Declaration:
"The Principality of Liechtenstein wishes to reaffirm the importance it attaches to transfers of technology and to biotechnology in order to ensure the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity. The compliance with intellectual property rights constitutes an essential element for the implementation of policies for technology transfer and co-investment.
For the Principality of Liechtenstein, transfers of technology and access to biotechnology, as defined in the text of the [said] Convention, will be carried out in accordance with article 16 of the said Convention and in compliance with the principles and rules of protection of intellectual property, in particular multilateral and bilateral agreements signed or negotiated by the Contracting Parties to this Convention.
The Principality of Liechtenstein will encourage the use of the financial mechanism established by the Convention to promote the voluntary transfer of intellectual property rights held by Liechtenstein operators, in particular as regards the granting of licenses, through normal commercial mechanisms and decisions, which ensuring adequate and effective protection of property rights."
papua new guinea
Declaration:
"The Government of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea declares its understanding that ratification of the Convention shall in no way constitute a renunciation of any rights under International Law concerning State responsibility for the adverse effects of Biological Diversity as derogating from the principles of general International Law."
sudan
Understanding:
"With respect to the principle stipulated in article 3, the Government of the Sudan agrees with the spirit of the article and interprets it to mean that no state is responsible for acts that take place outside its control event if they fall within its judicial jurisdiction and may cause damage to the environment of other states or of areas beyond the limits of national judicial jurisdiction."
"The Sudan also sees as regards article 14 (2), that the issue of liability and redresss for damage to biological diversity should not form a priority to be tackled by the Agreement as there is ambiguity regarding the essence and scope of the studies to be carried out, in accordance with the above-mentioned article. The Sudan further believes that any such studies on liability and redress should shift towards effects of areas such as biotechnology products, environmental impacts, genetically modified organisms and acid rains."
swiTzerland
Upon signature:
Declaration:
The Swiss Government wishes to emphasize particularly the progress made in establishing standard terms for cooperation between States in a very important field: research activities and activities for the transfer of technology relevant to resources from third countries.
The important provisions in question create a platform for even closer cooperation with public research bodies or institutions in Switzerland and for the transfer of technologies available to governmental or public bodies, particularly universities and various publicly-funded research and development centres.
It is our understanding that genetic resources acquired under the procedure specified in article 15 and developed by private research institutions will be the subject of programmes of cooperation, joint research and the transfer of technology which will respect the principles and rules for the protection of intellectualproperty.
These principles and rules are essential for research and private investment, in particular in the latest technologies, such as modern biotechnology which requires substantial financial outlays. On the basis of this interpretation, the Swiss Government wishes to indicate that it is ready, at the opportune time, to take the appropriate general policy measures, particularly under articles 16 and 19, with a view to promoting and encouraging cooperation, on a contractual basis, between Swiss firms and the private firms and governmental bodies of other Contracting Parties.
With regard to financial cooperation, Switzerland interprets the provisions of articles 20 and 21 as follows: the resources to be committed and the management system will have regard, in an equitable manner, to the needs and interests of the developing countries and to the possibilities and interests of the developed countries.
Upon ratification:
Declaration:
Switzerland wishes to reaffirm the importance it attaches to transfers of technology and to biotechnology in order to ensure the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity The compliance with intellectual property rights constitutes and essential element for the implementation of policies for technology transfer and co-investment.
For Switzerland, transfers of technology and access to biotechnology, as defined in the text of the Convention on Biological Diversity, will be carried out in accordance with article 16 of the said Convention and in compliance with the principles and rules of protection of intellectual property, in particular multilateral and bilateral agreements signed or negotiated by the Contracting Parties to this Convention.
Switzerland will encourage the use of the financial mechanism established by the Convention to promote the voluntary transfer of intellectual property rights held by Swiss operators, in particular as regards the granting of licences, through normal commercial mechanisms and decisions, while ensuring adequate and effective protection of property rights.
syrian arab republic
Upon signature:
Declaration:
It is being understood that the signing of this Convention shall not constitute recognition of Israel or leading to any intercourse with it.
united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland
Declaration made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:
The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland declare their understanding that article 3 of the Convention sets out a guiding principle to be taken into account in the implementation of the Convention.
The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland also declare their understanding that the decisions to be taken by the Conference of the Parties under paragraph 1 of article 21 concern "the amount of resources needed" by the financial mechanism, and that nothing in article 20 or 21 authorises the Conference of the Parties to take decisions concerning the amount, nature, frequency or size of the contributions of the Parties under the Convention.
Notes:
1 In respect of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Bailiwick of Jersey, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Gibraltar, St. Helena and St. Helena Dependencies.